PREMIUM LEGAL RESOURCES
ASK A LAWYER
by Richard Armknecht,III
In bankruptcy proceedings, the treatment of tax debts attempts to
reconcile two conflicting policies. Although the government is
interested in collecting taxes, bankruptcy policy is intended to give
honest debtors a fresh start (while protecting creditors) by providing
for the orderly liquidation or reorganization of the debtor's estate.
Partly because of this underlying tension, the provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.) regarding the dischargeability of tax debts
in bankruptcy are quite complex. A debtor's ability to discharge any
tax debt is based upon the classification of that particular tax debt.
For the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code, a tax claim can be
characterized as either a trust fund tax, a secured claim, an
administrative tax claim, a priority tax claim, a general unsecured
claim, or a penalty claim.
TRUST FUND TAXES
Trust fund taxes that have been collected by the debtor from third
parties (e.g., sales taxes and income tax withholdings) are held in
trust by the debtor for the appropriate taxing authority. Such amounts
held in trust are simply not property of the debtor or of the bankruptcy
estate. If, however, the debtor has failed to collect and/or remit to
the appropriate taxing authority a trust fund tax, then the relevant
taxing authority will have a priority tax claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Secured claims are those claims that are secured by a lien on the
debtor's property. A claim is secured to the extent of the value of the
property securing the claim. For example, a claim for $40,000 secured
by a piece of property worth $10,000 would be a secured claim of $10,000
and either a priority tax claim or a general unsecured claim of $30,000.
If a creditor has a lien on property that is subject to superior liens
in excess of the value of the property, the claim is not secured. Thus,
if the IRS files a tax lien upon a piece of lienerty worth $40,000 that
is subject to a prelienting lien in the amount of $100,000, the entire
tax lien claim would be either a priority tax claim -->lienn general
unsecured claim because of the preexistinlienen. If the amount of the
superior lien is less than the value of the property upon which the IRS
filed its lien, then tlienRS will have a secured claim to the extent
that the value of the property exceeds the value of the superior lien.
The remaining balance of the tax claim would either be a general
unsecured claim or a priority tax claim.
ADMINISTRATIVE TAX CLAIMS
Administrative tax claims consist of taxes that have accrued during the
pendency of the bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(1) accords administrative
status to any tax that is incurred by the estate. There are two
exceptions. The first are taxes of a kind specified in 11 U.S.C.
507(a)(8) that constitute priority tax claims. The second are those tax
claims that are attributable to an excessive allowance of a tentative
carry-back adjustment that the estate received, whether the taxable year
to which such adjustment relates ended before or after the commencement
of the case. 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(1) further accords administrative tax
claim status to any fine, penalty, or reduction in credit relating to an
Several courts of appeals have found that interest on administrative tax
claims is accorded administrative status by implication. Accordingly,
any tax that accrues during the bankruptcy proceeding (together with any
penalty or interest associated with such tax) will generally constitute
an administrative tax claim entitled to treatment as a 507(a)(1) first
priority claim. Note, however, that the Supreme Court has recently
accepted certiorari on a case holding that administrative tax penalties
are subject to equitable subordination under 11 U.S.C. 510(c),
notwithstanding 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(1)(C). (See U.S. v. Noland (In re First
Truck Lines, Inc.), 48 F.3d 210 (6th Cir. 1995), cert. granted, 116
S.Ct. 558 (1995))
PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS
Priority tax claim status is granted to certain "allowed unsecured
claims of governmental units" under 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(8). Note that the
terms of this section of the Bankruptcy Code preclude a tax claim from
being treated as both a priority tax claim and a secured claim. The
categories of priority tax claims include the following:
* Taxes "on or measured by income or gross receipts" as defined in
detail by statute.
* Unsecured property taxes assessed prior to the bankruptcy but last
payable without penalty less than one year prior to the filing of the
* "A tax required to be collected or withheld and for which the debtor
is liable in whatever capacity."
* Certain employment taxes as defined in detail by statute.
* Certain excise taxes as defined in detail by statute.
* Certain customs duties as defined in detail by statute.
* Pre-petition interest on priority tax claims and penalties
compensating for actual pecuniary losses related to the priority tax
claims are also entitled to priority status.
The most complicated of the detailed statutory definitions of priority
tax claims is the definition located at 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(8)(A), which
provides priority status to allowed unsecured claims of governmental
units to the extent that they are for a tax on (or measured by) income
or gross receipts (e.g., federal income tax) but only if such tax is:
(1) for a taxable year ending on or before the date of the filing of the
petition, where the return for such taxable year (if any return is
required) was last due less than three years before the date of the
filing of the petition (the "three-year rule"); (2) assessed within 240
days (plus certain additions related to offers in compromise) before the
date of the filing of the petition (the "240-day rule"); or (3)
generally, taxes not assessed before, but assessable (under applicable
law or by agreement) after, the commencement of the case (the "post-
THE "THREE-YEAR RULE." Priority status is accorded under the "three-
year rule" if a tax has been assessed for a taxable year ending on or
before the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition. In other
words, post-petition taxes are not priority tax claims. (They are
administrative tax claims.) Next, the return, with any extensions, must
have been due less than three years prior to the date of filing. The
date upon which the return is finally due is critical to determining
priority status. The three-year period did not begin to run with respect
to a Form 1040 until it was due on April 15, 1996, for example, even
though the Form 1040 was actually filed on January 30, 1996.
This principle also applies to extensions to file that effectively move
the return's due date to a later date. Accordingly, if the due date for
a federal income tax return, Form 1040, was originally April 15, 1992,
but the taxpayer extended the due date until August 15, 1992 (by filing
with the IRS an Automatic Extension to File Federal Income Tax Return,
Form 4868, which automatically extends the due date for a Form 1040 by
four months), then filing bankruptcy on August 14, 1995, would result in
the taxes being classified as a priority claim, whereas filing
bankruptcy on August 16, 1995, would result in the 1991 taxes being
classified as a general, unsecured claim. Keeping track of these dates
is crucial--courts have held legal counsel liable for malpractice, for
example, when the bankruptcy petition was filed prior to the date on
which a tax debt would have become dischargeable.
Of course, taxes due from the 1992, 1993, and 1994 tax years would
constitute priority claims. Whether the 1995 taxes would be priority
claims depends upon whether the debtor elects (under I.R.C.
1398(d)(2)(A)) to declare a short tax year ending August 15, 1995 (the
day before the filing of the bankruptcy petition). The taxes owed on the
pre-petition short year will constitute a priority claim under the
three-year rule. If no election to declare a short year is made, then
the tax liability that has accrued before the date of the petition may
not be a claim against the bankruptcy estate, but rather an
(undischarged) obligation of the debtor.
The "240-day rule." Priority status is generally granted under the "240-
day rule" if the taxes are assessed within 240 days of the petition
date. Typically, the 240-day rule applies when additional taxes are
assessed as a result of an IRS examination or the taxpayer's filing of
an amended return. Taxes are usually assessed after a taxpayer is given
notice of an alleged deficiency in the taxpayer's return and the
taxpayer has had an opportunity to challenge the deficiency. The date
of assessment is the date upon which the proposed tax described in the
notice of deficiency becomes final.
For example, assume that a debtor filed for bankruptcy on April 16,
1996, and filed his 1992 tax return on April 15, 1993, which was the
date upon which the return was due. In this situation, the tax would
not qualify for priority tax claim status under 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(8)(i).
If, however, pursuant to an examination, additional taxes were assessed
on January 1, 1996 (less than 240 days prior to April 16, 1996), the
additional taxes would qualify for priority tax claim status.
The 240-day time frame is subject to certain modifications. If the 240th
day prior to the bankruptcy petition falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or
legal holiday, then the relevant period is extended back to the next
prior business day. The period for assessing taxes is also extended with
respect to any periods for which an offer to compromise was under
consideration (plus an additional 30 days). For example, if debtor
filed a bankruptcy petition on May 1, 1996, and a tax liability had been
assessed on May 1, 1995 (366 days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy
petition), the tax liability would qualify for priority tax claim status
if an offer to compromise the assessed liability had been under
consideration for 96 days or more (366 days less the sum of 96 days plus
30 days equals 240 days).
Caution should be exercised in determining whether an assessment has
been made. Do not rely on the verbal statements of an IRS
representative. If the debtor has any doubts as to when an assessment
was made, debtor's counsel should request a Certificate of Assessments
(Form 23-C) from the IRS.
The "post-petition rule." Priority tax claim status is also accorded to
some taxes that are assessed after the bankruptcy petition date. These
are taxes for which the statute of limitations for additional
assessments has not run out on the date the debtor files bankruptcy.
The IRS may assess income taxes prior to the expiration of the three-
year period beginning the day after the date on which the return was
filed or is deemed filed. Returns that are filed early are deemed to be
filed on the last day when the return is due without penalty. Thus, if
the IRS can still assess additional taxes without being barred by
limitations on the date the petition is filed, these taxes are also
entitled to priority status. A taxpayer may also agree to extend the
statute of limitations. This agreement extends the period for which
priority status will apply.
Several other rules are relevant to calculating the statute of
limitations. Note, however, that the post-petition rule does not apply
to a tax of a kind specified in 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(1)(B) (relating to
taxes for which returns were never filed or for which returns were filed
late and less than two years prior to the filing of the bankruptcy
petition) or 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(1)(C) (relating to fraudulent returns and
willful attempts at tax evasion). Also note that the priority scheme
detailed above does not apply to taxes that are required to be withheld,
such as federal withholding taxes and state sales taxes, and for which
the debtor is liable in whatever capacity. These taxes will be priority
tax claims regardless of when they arise or are assessed.
GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS AND PENALTY CLAIMS
General unsecured taxes are taxes that are not entitled to secured,
administrative tax claim, or priority tax claim status. Typically,
these taxes are not entitled to qualify for priority tax claim status
because they are old claims.
Nonpecuniary tax penalties are a class of unsecured claims that may be
subordinated to general unsecured claims in some cases. A nonpecuniary
tax penalty is one that is intended to punish rather than to compensate.
Although opinions are split, two circuits have held that an "excise tax"
may be considered a tax penalty even though it is labeled as a tax. The
Supreme Court should soon resolve this split of opinion; it recently
accepted certiorari for a case in which the Sixth Circuit held that the
"tax" label accorded by the I.R.C. is not determinative and that pre-
petition excise taxes actually constitute penalties subject to equitable
subordination under 11 U.S.C. 510(c). (See In re CF&I Fabricators of
Utah, Inc., 53 F.3d 1155 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. granted, 116 S.Ct. 558
DISCHARGEABILITY OF TAXES
Taxes may be discharged in bankruptcy either through liquidation or
reorganization. In a liquidation proceeding (Chapter 7 case), the taxes
of an individual may be discharged under 11 U.S.C. 727. Taxes may also
be discharged pursuant to a plan under either Chapter 11 (11 U.S.C.
1141), or Chapter 13 (11 U.S.C. 1328(b)).
ENHANCED DISCHARGEABILITY UNDER CHAPTER 13
Discharges under Chapter 13 are available to individual wage earners
upon the confirmation of a plan of reorganization. Although the amount
of debt that may be discharged under Chapter 13 is limited, certain tax
liabilities may be discharged under Chapter 13 that would not otherwise
be dischargeable. For example, the exception to dischargeability under
11 U.S.C. 523(a)(1) is not applicable when payment of all priority tax
claims is provided for in the plan of reorganization, and the debtor
makes all of the plan payments. Thus, a debtor may obtain a discharge
for tax liabilities for which the statute of limitations has not expired
and for tax liabilities related to unfiled, or even fraudulent, returns.
Furthermore, under Chapter 13, creditors (including taxing authorities)
must file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy Court. If payment for
priority tax claims is provided under the plan, but no proof of claim is
submitted by the relevant taxing authority, there is no requirement that
the debtor pay the priority tax claim. If the taxing authority's proof
of claim is not filed in a timely manner, the claim could be objected to
and the debtor would not be required to pay the priority tax claim.
SIDEBAR: EXCEPTIONS TO DISCHARGEABILITY
The general exceptions to discharge are provided at 11 U.S.C. 523(a).
11 U.S.C. 523(a)(1) provides for nondischargeability with respect to
three types of tax debts. First, if a tax is a priority claim under 11
U.S.C. 507(a)(2) (claims arising prior to entry of an order for relief
in an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding) or 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(8), it is
nondischargeable. Whether taxes are priority tax claims or general
unsecured claims determines their dischargeability.
Second, if the taxpayer did not file a tax return, the taxpayer cannot
get a discharge of the tax liability. If the taxpayer files the return
late, the taxes are nondischargeable if the return was filed less than
two years prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Generally, a
return will only be deemed to have been filed for the purposes of 11
U.S.C. 523(a)(1) where the document filed with the IRS purports to be a
return, is sworn to as such, and evidences an honest attempt to satisfy
The following do not constitute a "return" for purposes of 11 U.S.C.
523(a)(1): an automatic extension request, a return that is not signed
by the debtor, and an amended return filed by a debtor who never filed
an original return. However, a court has deemed that a return was filed
under 11 U.S. C. 523(a)(1) when a debtor met with the IRS, admitted to
owing taxes, signed certain forms with sufficient information to
calculate the debtor's tax liability, and delivered the documents to the
Third, if the debtor files a fraudulent return or willfully attempts to
evade or defeat taxes, the taxes are nondischargeable. Under I.R.C.
7454(a) and related case law, the IRS has the burden of proving fraud by
clear and convincing evidence. Fraud has been held to include such
activities as submitting false withholding statements for the purpose of
eliminating withholding and failing to report embezzlement income.
Willful attempts to evade or defeat tax liabilities include such
activities as concealing assets and failing to either file returns or to
pay taxes over an extended period. Mere understatement of income,
however, is not fraud.
Federal tax liens are not discharged even if the underlying taxes are
discharged. Thus, secured taxes essentially are nondischargeable,
although personal liability may not be asserted.
Richard Armknecht is a Las Vegas lawyer.
from The Compleat Lawyer, Summer '96, Copyright 1996 Amer. Bar Assn.
Brought to you by - The 'Lectric Law Library
The Net's Finest Legal Resource for Legal Pros & Laypeople Alike.